“Viseum's Community SafetyWatch success is very important to London, the United Kingdom and indeed the rest of the world.” "The challenge is the powerful few who control world resources. They will resist any change right up to the end." "Up to 2021, less than 1% of humanity controlled everything because they owned everything. Greed became normalised and we began destroying ourselves on a colossal scale. Ironically, a pandemic connected everyone and we figured it out just in time!"

London families defeat their institutions’ abuse of power

From racial attacks and child abuse to state-sponsored domestic abuse, corruption, fraud and wrongfully arrests, race discrimination is engrained throughout English society.

A mixed-race-family in London has uncovered a well-evolved malpractice adopted by some of England’s local authorities. Their childcare services use schools, the Metropolitan Police and Mental Health Services NHS to indoctrinate the formative age of minority children.

Our large network fighting abuse of power has helped with strategy and leverage. Some of the perpetrators have raised their hands to admit their guilt and expose their colleagues.

The perpetrators unwittingly exposed why they do this. To save their budgets but fraudulently waste millions abusing England’s welfare system. To silence this family, many mistruths led to more mistruths until there were too many holes. It resulted in the perpetrators having to admit their guilt and attempt to fix the damage they had caused. 



This family has received a lot of support for publishing this. There has also been racist abuse. Viseum UK is one of the companies sponsoring this family. We are using their social media investigation technologies to follow this publication and help identify such people using off-topic trolling.

Family experiences the abuse of power

The mother is a respected academic from a minority country. The father is white English from London and well-known in law enforcement as a solutions innovator. In the year 2000, they were supported by the London Borough of Bexley to start their family and business. In 2012, their children started secondary school, and they experienced abuse of power to the extreme. In 2014, one of their children was violently attacked. For a further year, they were continuously victimised by their teachers. The same bully, from a well-known problematic family, was allowed to continuously target this child. But this isn’t all, in 2017 this child tried to start again at another school. But the abuse of power worsened more. Their parents’ calls for help astonishingly resulted in this child being abused to help another family (FamilyB) who are patients of Mental Health Services Oxlease NHS.

Bexley Council’s inhumane abuse of human rights

Bexley Council’s abuse of power – endorsed by MP

We followed several meetings between the London Borough of Bexley, Oxleas NHS and Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy school. Because of what happened next, it appears that they all agreed to use this mixed-race child to help FamilyB. On 06/04/2018 Sarah Robinson of Oxleas NHS was recorded giving this child a therapy session for them “to become independent”. This was to get them to leave their parents and live with FamilyB. That same day this child cried out several times to their parents, “I am independent” whilst leaving them to go and live with FamilyB.

Later in this case in May 2019, a politician helped expose this abuse of power. They helped this family create what we have proudly called Pier to Prom. It produced court-quality evidence of Bexley Council’s fraudulent use of the welfare system.

Worsening human rights abuse

Examples of abuse of power. This family’s solicitors have legalised recorded detail of the following events:

  • 21/06/2018 – The parents sent a safeguarding risk warning to all of Bexley Council’s public services about FamilyB. All of these organisations ignored this call for help.
  • 29/06/2018 just 8 days later – Bexley Council used Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy and Oxleas NHS, to formally put this child into the home of FamilyB without any assessments on either home.
  • 02/07/2018 – Susan Gallop from Bexley Council tried to persuade the parents to hand their parental rights over to the head of FamilyB. Still without any assessments.
  • 24/07/2018 – Proving their parents’ many years of calls for help were never looked at by anyone at this council, this child cleverly gave their parents’ letter, warning about FamilyB, to FamilyB, who ironically presented it to this council and it was acted upon immediately.
  • 25/07/2018 – The child received a life-threatening size bruise to their face for doing this. Bexley Council produced a Family and Home Assessment Report on the home of FamilyB, proving it was unsafe for this child. Bexley Council apologised to this child’s parents and attempted to extract the child from the home of FamilyB.

This child’s parents prepare to hold this institution to account

  • 10/08/2018 – Bexley Council attempted to silence this child’s parents. First by creating a highly corrupt “Child & Family Assessment Report” against them containing 11 counts of falsified information from FamilyB.
  • 15/08/2018 – Using the falsified assessment report, Bexley Council created a highly corrupt “Initial Child Protection Conference” containing 13 additional counts of falsified information. This was driven using more falsified information from Sarah Robinson of Oxleas NHS, who ceased working for the NHS when this child’s parents reported this to the Metropolitan Police.

Family Fights Back

This family took steps to stop their children from being abused this way. But, part of this abuse of power is a cross-department collaboration to avoid accountability. The only way to win their case was for this family to create a similarly large network. But with some key differences. No expense was spared employing elite professionals to prove the truth.

Questioning Abuse of Power

The actions on 10/08/2018 and 15/08/2018 were so that all of Bexley Council’s public services could have this case taken over by other members of staff. Although working in the same office, this meant they were no longer responsible for it. This council’s unprofessional actions were to avoid having to explain why they all ignored the safeguarding risk warning. This family’s legal team then asked Bexley Council the following questions:

  1. With less than 2 months between the parents sending their safeguarding risk warning, and Bexley Council attempting to silence them, how else can Bexley Council explain the unprecedented remarkable speed of these actions? Other than to hide this malpractice?
  2. Is it possible that Bexley Council has, in fact, discriminated against this family, by making their decisions based on saving their budgets, as opposed to considering the human rights of this child?
  3. Why was the safeguarding risk warning acted on immediately when FamilyB presented it, but not when this child’s parents first sent it?


  • Panoramic Security Camera
    A UK politician used the Metropolitan Police and the BBC to breach their ministerial code ...
    Learn More »
Forced to live a lie – Inhumane child cruelty


This child’s human rights solicitors proved that under these circumstances, any child in their formative years will remember their own experiences of their parents. They will also believe what they are being told by whoever has daily access to them. The most natural and logical reaction for any child under this much duress is extreme confusion. This will create and compound anxiety, and eventually cause enough conflict to create voices and hallucinations. This is what has happened to this child. When they started living with FamilyB, this child had many emergencies involving the Metropolitan Police and hospital A&E, because of self-harming. Their 100% immaculate school attendance suddenly dropped astonishingly below acceptable standards.

Quotes in 2020 

  • A UK Government senior civil servant, “We have also seen public servants abuse people’s children like this over their religious and political views. Children in their formative years are being indoctrinated by teachers, health, and social care workers into doing a lot of immoral and damaging things. I find it tragic for a non-white child to live through it for their family to publish this horror.”
  • The Metropolitan Police, “This is an exact mirror of what has happened to several other minority families. But, this is the first time it has been exposed. Their children must be extremely confused.”
  • Bexley Council, “We know about what happened to your children. We have read your file. You are very good and caring parents. You always attend meetings. Our problem was our professional services hadn’t listened to your concerns.”
Example of brainwashing:

In April 2019, the offending staff at this council became desperate to save their careers. To exonerate themselves, they brainwashed this child to think they had autism. They fast-tracked the waiting list for NHS autism tests, from over 2 years to 1 month. They offered this child financial benefits to encourage them to have an autism test urgently. This child considered suicide because they were then forced to convince their parents to agree they should have the autism test. This council hadn’t realised the strength of this child fighting back, which created Pier to Prom.

This family exploited how being institutionalised often influences what and how people think. They published many voice recordings of senior and frontline staff at this council reasoning how they would wrongfully use this family to save council resources, to help FamilyB. This child’s parents have taken legal action for professional negligence and incompetence, against all perpetrating organisations from this council. This child’s parents asked each of these organisations to settle this case privately using mutually selected ombudsmen. They also offered to pay for their costs but none accepted this offer.

Landmark Legal Case

Human Rights Act 1998:

The perpetrating organisations have breached their legal duty to follow this act. They have failed this family in the following ways:

  • Article 3 protects you from being treated in an inhuman or degrading way.
  • Article 8 protects the right to respect for your private and family life, and your home.
    • The right to live your life without interference by the state.
    • The right to enjoy family relationships without interference from the state.
    • The right not to be separated from your family and to maintain contact if your family is split up.
    • Public authorities mustn’t prevent you from living in your home.
Equality Act 2010:

The perpetrating organisations have breached their legal duty to follow the Equality Act 2010, which includes the following laws on discrimination:

  • It is unlawful to directly, or indirectly, discriminate against a person who is accessing a service by treating them less favourably because of their protected characteristics, in this case, their race.
  • Places a duty on the service provider to ensure they do not subject another person to a detriment because they have made a formal complaint.

Perpetrators who break these laws will uncaringly ignore their victim’s wellbeing and human rights. They will hear and create what they want to fit, and in many cases ‘shoehorn’, their agenda.

Mixed-race discrimination:

It is well known in racial support groups how mixed-race families experience discrimination far worse than all other minorities. This is further worsened by the perpetrators from minority races, who feel they are excused, and they will take their own experiences of discrimination to their victims.

UK Authorities' judgment 2020:

These 3 regulatory bodies are following this case in support of this family’s human rights:

  • On 28/05/2020 the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman published, “This matter would need to be addressed by a court.” This child’s parents were advised how this publication usually makes the council take steps to fix the damage they have caused. We then followed meetings between several UK Government senior civil servants, Bexley Council and members of the wider community involved in this case. We are confident that all perpetrators were instructed to correct the harm they have done. This family took advantage of this noticeable change to begin getting their lives back on track.
  • On 20/01/2020 the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards advised us, we will need to pursue the legal remedy available for that breach. If a court finding is made against this MP, then they could open an inquiry into a potential breach of the Code of Conduct.
  • On 31/01/2020 the investigating officer for Conservative Party Complaints advised us to seek legal action for what is clearly a complex matter.
Witnesses and compelling evidence:

We have published this family’s achievements since July 2017. We have reputable news reporters and sponsors witnessing each step throughout this case. Also, we have witnesses of many people inside Bexley Council and its police stations reading and talking about it. Many wanted to find out if their breach of human rights led to any of this family’s children committing suicide. Bexley Council replied to this family’s initial complaint with words to the effect, “We have no record of the meetings that you have recorded and these meetings’ minutes that you witnessed being taken were not taken.” And, “We are going to deny all of your claims because the amount of financial settlement you are asking for is too much.”

With diaries all through this ordeal, this child’s parents recorded, documented and legalised with their solicitors, all communication with staff from this council’s public services. This has amassed many years of their child’s true feelings. Many thousands of phone calls, meetings, letters and emails, all with this child’s parents using the words “please help treat our child”. Verifying everything, they now have irrefutable evidence of this council’s abuse of power, proving council staff doing their minimum to keep the child in their workflow, but never having any intent to help them.

This shows how the abuse of power has become normal in today’s way of life. This is the world’s first publicised escape for a family from one of England’s most corrupt institutions. Press packs include case files against all perpetrating organisations with 6 years of correlated, verified and legalised evidence of their abuse of power:

  • Chapter 1 “Bullying and Victimisation” 2014 – 2016.
  • Chapter 2 “Treatment” 2016 – Today.

Perpetrating Organisations:

  • Bexley Children’s Social Care Services:
    • Director Jacky Tiotto, Fiona Cisneros, Donna Hillocks, Martin Clement, Jodie Eggleston, Linda Brown, Susan Gallop, Anne Day, Louise Westron.
  • Mental Health Services Oxleas NHS. It is common knowledge that the NHS lack specialist training to treat mental health:
    • Clinical Director Lesley French, Ui Peng Khoo, Kate Doherty, Reshad Soobratty, Sarah Robinson, Mariam Miller.
  • First School – Bexleyheath Academy. With a reputation for bullying, victimisation and discrimination against minority-race children:
    • Principal Carl Wakefield, Vice Principal Mark Lewis, Deborah Sweeney.
  • Second School – Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy. The biggest perpetrators who have inflicted the most cruelty to this child:
    • Principal Richard Farrow, Vice Principal Sian Evans, Safeguarding and Welfare Officer J O’Brien.

Richard Farrow, “I am sorry we used social services. We pay lots to a company that deals with this, and we should have used them.”

Carl Wakefield, “Oh, you are a good family. I am so sorry we did not think about your family.”

Mark Lewis, “Carl Wakefield would help but now he has gone we are not going to.”

Donna Hillocks, “You are a minority so you will be treated this way throughout your daily life.”

Jacky Tiotto, left Bexley Council the same time Bexley Council’s legal team began their defence in this case.








Criminal Charges


Many of these perpetrators are being tracked because they have fled this council to distance themselves from this case. They have been made aware that if this child commits suicide, then their parents will have the legal powers to take action against them for manslaughter.

Winning Strategy Unveiled


Because of the complexity of cross-department collaboration, nobody thought that this child’s parents could use the law to expose this. In 2017, their child signed a contract with their family’s solicitors for them to seek justice in their case. This is what they have been doing as one of the empowered law firms fighting this case.

The parents’ strategy comes from a network of sponsors. A key strategy was this network’s use of the father to encourage everyone to think that he was leading this fight. The father remained the most vocal to encourage the council to solely target him. Bexley Council gave this child false information to only humiliate and discredit him. This worked. This family’s solicitors said, Pier to Prom would have been impossible without this strategy.”